The idea that these learning theories are out there and are compulsory
knowledge for graduating teachers intrigues me. Personally I never liked high
school nor did I do very well. It is difficult for me to believe that my
teachers trialed any of the digital pedagogy ideas in class, well perhaps they
did, but I had deemed it lame and continued to scratch “Pearl Jam” into the
desk with my compass. The purpose of the Wiki activity succeeded greatly for me.
Having an idea on where I stood regarding the mobile phone debate it was
interesting processing other people’s opinions in a reflective state. Meaning,
I was allowed to hear others opinions without having to debate or make my
stance clear. I sifted through opinions and extracted fragments that engaged
me. Overall the Wiki was easy to navigate and a pretty simple activity but the
sharing of thoughts and instant access to differing opinions made my reflection
process further informed. Instead of having a thought and noting a few dot
points to support it we were given a greater range of opinions which swayed and
solidified my opinion. The uncomplicated design and purpose of this Wiki was a
success.
The SAMR theory is used well with the Wiki exercise as I
believe it falls within the “redefinition” heading. Having the Wiki accessible
at all times with a constantly growing community of opinions it truly is
technology allowing for the creation of new tasks. Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy
goes hand in hand with de Bono’s six hats. We were asked to look from all
angles regarding phones in class encouraging evaluation, comprehension,
knowledge, analysis, application and synthesis. Digital pedagogy is supported
through facilitating higher order thinking, collaborating with conversation and
learning situated in real life context. This Wiki activity, by no mistake I’m
sure, fully adheres to all our recently learnt theories and is a great example
for future teachers.
The purpose of scaffolding the task regarding six hats in
the debate of mobile phones supports the students to stay on task whilst having
the freedom to create personal opinions and to evaluate their own and others
opinions. Once the scaffold is removed and the student appreciates their work
standing unsupported they may gain a sense of confidence. This is a valuable
tool in future learning.
I really like the idea of your history blog, that could grow to something really engaging and collaborative. I agree that bloggs are an evolving process, as we learn we will experiment, we just need time as do all educators.
ReplyDelete